<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utz pulls a product branding &#8220;oops&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/</link>
	<description>A restaurant branding blog done with Vigor™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Szala</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Szala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Haha. Yummmm. Chips.

Serious point: I agree with you. It does happen all the time in companies big and small. It fails all the time too. GM, Chevy, Ford, etc. Talk about over-extended product lines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Yummmm. Chips.</p>
<p>Serious point: I agree with you. It does happen all the time in companies big and small. It fails all the time too. GM, Chevy, Ford, etc. Talk about over-extended product lines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Benninghove</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Benninghove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Yea i get the keeping up the the joneses but in the real world it happens daily and perception is 9/10ths reality.  Innovation is definately key i agree whole heartedly, but unfortunately those kneejerk reactions happen all the time. 

I wonder what the production cost was on the healthy chip, better yet...who wants a healthy chip anyhow? I eat chips because they taste good, if i want healthy i&#039;ll grab a freakin rice cake...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea i get the keeping up the the joneses but in the real world it happens daily and perception is 9/10ths reality.  Innovation is definately key i agree whole heartedly, but unfortunately those kneejerk reactions happen all the time. </p>
<p>I wonder what the production cost was on the healthy chip, better yet&#8230;who wants a healthy chip anyhow? I eat chips because they taste good, if i want healthy i&#8217;ll grab a freakin rice cake&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Szala</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Szala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Yo Paul!
Keeping up with the Joneses is a knee-jerk reaction in business that can cost millions of investment dollars with high chances of lost capital. For what? Just so you can say you&#039;re hip? Sounds like the product just became a marketing ploy. That&#039;s a bad move.

Utz has fostered a brand for decades. Instead of cannibalizing the existing brand, develop a new brand for the new product. See Toyota&#039;s Scion line. See Williams-Sonoma&#039;s former baby West Elm.

Touting &quot;healthy chips&quot; devalues the other chips. It puts a negative mark on them in the eyes of the existing brand lovers. A new brand will start to create its own followers and brand lovers. They still compete, but now more Utz lovers stay with Utz and New Product chomps onto competing brands&#039; market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Paul!<br />
Keeping up with the Joneses is a knee-jerk reaction in business that can cost millions of investment dollars with high chances of lost capital. For what? Just so you can say you&#8217;re hip? Sounds like the product just became a marketing ploy. That&#8217;s a bad move.</p>
<p>Utz has fostered a brand for decades. Instead of cannibalizing the existing brand, develop a new brand for the new product. See Toyota&#8217;s Scion line. See Williams-Sonoma&#8217;s former baby West Elm.</p>
<p>Touting &#8220;healthy chips&#8221; devalues the other chips. It puts a negative mark on them in the eyes of the existing brand lovers. A new brand will start to create its own followers and brand lovers. They still compete, but now more Utz lovers stay with Utz and New Product chomps onto competing brands&#8217; market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Benninghove</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Benninghove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Interesting arguement here.  Don&#039;t you think alot of times extending the product line is done as a reaction to competition in the marketplace extending their line? 

Not that reactionary marketing and product dev is a good thing but it can be a necessary evil so that your company seems at least somewhat progressive to your customers. Although i&#039;m not a branding expert so who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting arguement here.  Don&#8217;t you think alot of times extending the product line is done as a reaction to competition in the marketplace extending their line? </p>
<p>Not that reactionary marketing and product dev is a good thing but it can be a necessary evil so that your company seems at least somewhat progressive to your customers. Although i&#8217;m not a branding expert so who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Szala</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Szala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey Kristina,
Good thoughts.

P&amp;G is definitely in another league, but the theory remains the same. A brand name can stand for one thing and one thing only. It never can stand for more than one thing in a consumer&#039;s mind. It&#039;s psychological.

Martins Chips make amazing kettle-cooked goodness. Utz has been competing with them for decades. By extending their brand into healthier options, Utz now detracts from it&#039;s original offering. This leaves the door open for Martin&#039;s to dig in an reinforce its brand promise of making the best kettle cooked chip.

By extending a product line and leveraging a brand name, market share rarely increases by much. As you just said, you will now eat the healthier Utz instead of the other Utz. Therefore, Utz just lost a customer from its traditional brand and added one to its new brand.

They added the expense of a new product manufacturing, branding, packaging and distribution to just split their customer base and gain little new customers. In doing so, they now opened the door for a smaller snack company to steal more market share in the traditional chip space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kristina,<br />
Good thoughts.</p>
<p>P&#038;G is definitely in another league, but the theory remains the same. A brand name can stand for one thing and one thing only. It never can stand for more than one thing in a consumer&#8217;s mind. It&#8217;s psychological.</p>
<p>Martins Chips make amazing kettle-cooked goodness. Utz has been competing with them for decades. By extending their brand into healthier options, Utz now detracts from it&#8217;s original offering. This leaves the door open for Martin&#8217;s to dig in an reinforce its brand promise of making the best kettle cooked chip.</p>
<p>By extending a product line and leveraging a brand name, market share rarely increases by much. As you just said, you will now eat the healthier Utz instead of the other Utz. Therefore, Utz just lost a customer from its traditional brand and added one to its new brand.</p>
<p>They added the expense of a new product manufacturing, branding, packaging and distribution to just split their customer base and gain little new customers. In doing so, they now opened the door for a smaller snack company to steal more market share in the traditional chip space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://blog.vigorbranding.com/2009/01/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vigorbranding.com/?p=1#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I do agree that when a company decides  to extend their product line it is essential not to loose brand loyalty. However, I disagree with your example of Utz not handling this properly. Huge corporate conglomerates such as P&amp;G or Unilever cannot be compared to Utz potato chip company. As an avid lover of the Utz  Salt and Vinegar “fatty chip”, I know this company knows their way around a potato. Now that I am on my 09 diet, the next trip down the chip isle at the grocery store will involve me going to my brand of choice and picking there now healthier option. I think the only flaw here was excluding the “Utz Girl” on the package design as she is an icon in the Baltimore area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree that when a company decides  to extend their product line it is essential not to loose brand loyalty. However, I disagree with your example of Utz not handling this properly. Huge corporate conglomerates such as P&amp;G or Unilever cannot be compared to Utz potato chip company. As an avid lover of the Utz  Salt and Vinegar “fatty chip”, I know this company knows their way around a potato. Now that I am on my 09 diet, the next trip down the chip isle at the grocery store will involve me going to my brand of choice and picking there now healthier option. I think the only flaw here was excluding the “Utz Girl” on the package design as she is an icon in the Baltimore area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

